Plaintiff’s case:
It is the plaintiff’s case that around the 7th June, 2003, the plaintiff purchased the Suitland from a one, Amongo Esiteri and paid a consideration of UGX. 150,000/= and an agreement drawn to that effect. That the plaintiff thereupon, entered the Suitland and started cultivating the same until the year, 2014, when, owing to being a pastor in the Baptist Church, the plaintiff was transferred to Natoto Church. That in 2017 when he returned to check on the Suitland, he found when the defendant had entered thereupon, hence this suit to recover the said Suitland.
Defendant’s case:
The defendant, on the 16th October, 2024, filed a written statement of defence in reply thereof disputing the claim together with a counter claim. Therein his defence, he raised several points of objection to the effect that the suit is irregular, nonstarter, frivolous, vexatious, and undated, in abuse of court process and bad in law.
In his counter claim, he sought declarations that he is the rightful owner of the suitland, a permanent injunction, general damages and costs of the counter claim.
FULL JUDGEMENT:
Download Here: MUGANZI_PARTRICK_-VS-_OTIONO_MOSES_(FINAL)